Death Comes to Pemberley
Item Details
- Description
- Full Record
- Author Notes
- Contents
- Excerpts
- Reviews
- Summary
- A\V Summary
Searching for more content…
In a marvelous, thrilling re-creation of the world of Pride and Prejudice, P.D. James fuses her lifelong passion for the work of Jane Austen with her own great talent for writing crime fiction. The year is 1803, and Darcy and Elizabeth have been married for six years. There are now two handsome, healthy
… More »In a marvelous, thrilling re-creation of the world of Pride and Prejudice, P.D. James fuses her lifelong passion for the work of Jane Austen with her own great talent for writing crime fiction. The year is 1803, and Darcy and Elizabeth have been married for six years. There are now two handsome, healthy sons in the Pemberley nursery, Elizabeth's beloved sister Jane and her husband, Bingley, live within seventeen miles, the ordered and secure life of Pemberley seems unassailable, and Elizabeth's happiness in her marriage is complete. But their peace is threatened and old sins and misunderstandings are rekindled on the eve of the annual autumn ball. The Darcys and their guests are preparing to retire for the night when a chaise appears, rocking down the path from Pemberley's wild woodland, and as it pulls up, Lydia Wickham, an uninvited guest, tumbles out, screaming that her husband has been murdered.
« LessCommunity Activity
Please keep in mind that some of the content that we make available to you through this application comes from Amazon Web Services. All such content is provided to you "as is". This content and your use of it are subject to change and/or removal at any time.

Comment
Add a CommentI agree wholeheartedly with what "emerge" said on Mar. 12, 2012: this is an unsuccessful blending of the styles of Austen and James. Thoroughly disappointing. I read the whole thing because I did want to see what happened and how James handled it, but I did something I usually never do and speed-read most of it. Definitely not worth it and die-hard Austen fans may take umbrage at the liberties James takes with some of the characters. Darcy seemed at times to have turned into Dalgliesh, and the scene in the epilogue when he and Elizabeth look back to and discuss their motivations and emotions in early courtship sounded entirely like P.D. James trying to lead a seminar in Austen. Just silly.
What a disappointment! The first third of the book is fine. It was done in the style of Jane Austen and made me smile. But it goes downhill pretty drastically so that by the last quarter of the book I was just skimming it to see if anything important happened. It's going back to the library early. Don't waste your time.
very disappointing, not much of a mystery. Too much of the "action" happens in letters and "after the trial" information. Minimal tension. Good representation of Jane Austen's characters, but sometimes she almost seemed to make a caricature of them. Doesn't work as a mystery or a Jane Austen homage.
This is the more disappointing since PD James can definitely write. It may be possible that she is being too careful and too respectful of the Austen canon. However, despite the care taken to be faithful to the characters and style (and the interesting touches working in other Austen titles) there is little tension in the work. It's just a bit dull.
An enjoyable light read, PD James captures the sense and language of Austen. Not terribly suspenseful but I feel she does Austen better than most trying to cash in on Austen's popularity.
very disappointing - don't bother reading this - it is a waste of time
rather slow...of course we expect that
This book demonstrates what a great author Jane Austen was. As wonderful a mystery writer PD James is, she cannot come close. The book is a mystery involving Elizabeth and Fitzwilliam Darcy after their marriage. While supposedly a period piece, it is clear that this is not written by a 17th Century author. Very superficial. Very disappointing
This is not a Jane Austen novel, it is a P. D. James novel, and should be read (and judged) as such. It will likely be read by many who have not read Austen's masterpiece. As to be expected, James is masterful at limning the quotidien life and ethos of the period. There is an overreliance on exposition, and needless repitition, in what is less of a mystery than a crime novel. One does care what happens next, but this is not James at her best.
Kudos for the authentic Austen writing style but that's where it ends.